Christian wrote: > 2 people have already commented kinda negatively, however, I found it to > be a great portrait lens. I didn't find it horribly soft wide open and > actually thought it was a pretty darn good lens. Built in hood, > color-coded aperture markings... just don't shoot into the sun. I paid > $25 for mine.
I think the big problem with the Takumar 135/2.5 is the K 135/2.5. IMO, the Takumar isn't a bad lens ... except in comparison with the stellar K. -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
