The only issue I've run across is that you will have trouble using SR on a tripod if bracketing for HDR rendering (Registration will be distinctly off).
-Adam Markus Maurer wrote: > This may be a stupid question but does SR/IS have any negative side effects? > greetings > Markus > > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von > K.Takeshita > Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. November 2006 01:11 > An: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Betreff: Re: Pentax 1.8 85mm > > > On 11/25/06 6:53 PM, "J. C. O'Connell", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The body technique has many advantages >> over the lens technique, but for film bodies, >> its a no go, thats probably the sole >> advantage of the lens technique, it works >> for either film or digital. > > I do not have a K100D and am still waiting for the K10D. > I have a couple of Canon IS zooms (consumer grade, 28-135 and 75-300) and > one thing I might miss would be the confident feeling of the finder image > actually stabilize as you peep. In the end, we get the same benefit, be it > an in-camera or an in-lens system, but for the DSLR, through the lens > confirmation of how the image is being stabilized would be beneficial (aside > from the argument of possible image degradation due to additional lens > system required for IS etc). > I am so used to in-lens stabilization but the ability to make any lens into > the stabilized ones would eventually prevail. Don't know what happens when > they ever go FF, but that's another story which we have no way of knowing > for now :-). > > Ken > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
