Would the new lenses due out next year with IS work with the Z1p? Ever the optimist
Peter On 11/25/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It certainly was against your better judgement, > I specifically mentioned that some were done > with bodies and some were done with lenses, > but the net effect of all of the them is > that the image tracks the camera movement > to keep the recorded image from blurring.... > Nobody mentioned it but the lens technique > has one major advantage over the body > technique, and that is it will work for > film as well digital whereas its not > really possible to do IS for film in the > body... > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 1:34 PM > To: pdml@pdml.net > Subject: Re: Pentax 1.8 85mm > > > In a message dated 11/24/2006 11:29:31 AM Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > IS, VR, Shake reduction, etc. They are all the > same concept ( done in either lenses or bodies ) > with different trade names.... > jco > ======= > Sigh. Against my better judgment, I respond. > > They are different. One of the biggest differences is that some are in > camera > and some are in lens. This makes quite a difference as regards usage. > > One of the reasons I will probably switch back to Pentax from Canon, > after I > hear more reports and read reviews. > > Marnie aka Doe And since I have no K or M lenses, I need no $5-$1,000 > part. > Nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
