Pretty much my conclusions. 2006/11/26, Lawrence Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think the main difference here is that the PEF requires compression, > while the DNG does not. So the speed for PEF would depend on the balance > between the increase in overhead for compression routine vs the reduction > in write time because of smaller file size. Slower writing during > shooting means that the buffer would fill up faster. > > Another possibility is that more RAM is required for compression, and > therefore less is available for the buffer. > > > On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Bob Sullivan wrote: > > I shot PEF's until the buffer was full. > > It took about 8 in a row until the buffer needed to slow things down. > > They were 12 to 13.5 meg each. > > I shot DGN's until the buffer was full. > > It took about 11 in a row until the buffer slowed things down. > > They were 16 megs each. > > ... Does this mean the K10D is doing something > > different with the DGN's? How? > > -- > --Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence -- > --Tungsten T3 Enhanced DIA Keyboard----Nokia Ringtone Convertor-- > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
