My results are preliminary, but after about 400 exposures with the K10D, I'm quite sure that I can get better results in low light with this camera than I can with the *istD. It's a combination of SR and very good high ISO performance. I think you'll feel the same way once you try it. Paul On Nov 26, 2006, at 5:38 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 26/11/06, John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> DPReview is the Domain of Pixel-peepers. How many people are >> reporting >> these problems? How many know what they are talking about? How many >> actually need 1600 ISO, given that the camera has shake-reduction >> built-in. >> >> I haven't yet got my K10D, but I suspect this is all a load of >> rubbish >> from the usual suspects. > > It sure is John, and maybe you should have a little think about why SR > can't compensate for lost sensitivity in many shooting situations. :-/ > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
