I miss curves in ACR. 3.x when working in ACR 2.x. But I find I can get fairly close with just the sliders in the old ACR and then touch up with curves in PSCS once the file is open. I'm sure there are minor technical differences in the way the tonal gradations are accomplished, but it's nothing I can see. Still, I'd like to have the new software. I do prefer Bridge to the Browser, and I want to try Smart Sharpening and the PSCS2 noise reduction. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If you're not buying until after ACR 3.8 ships, then you could use > DNG Converter to translate the PEF to DNG and continue to use PSCS. > > However, the features in later versions of CS and ACR 3.x are *well > worth* the upgrade price to me. I had occasion to teach my brother > some image processing techniques on his copy of CS this past week, > and I missed many of the features sorely. > > Godfrey > > On Nov 29, 2006, at 6:08 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > Sure, but since I don't have the camera yet, and probably won't > > until after > > Adobe releases the next upgrade, it's not an issue for me right > > now. Hmmm > > ... it just crossed my mind that in order to use the new version of > > ACR I'd > > have to upgrade to Photoshop CS2 .... well, then, it might be that > > I'd have > > to use DNG, for a while at least <sigh>. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
