Hey, there might even be more good things said about the 80-200 if Stan were still adding to his site. (At least one in this thread). Still building a site like the one Stan has is a fare amount of work, and to be honest I wouldn't want to do it, so I can understand why it hasn't been updated in a couple of years.
Boris Liberman wrote: > Admittedly FAJ 18-35 surprised me to the extreme. I shall be sure to > report about 80-200 when it arrives. > > On 11/29/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've never used one,. only one comment on Stan Halpin's review site, but >> it's not a bad comment, though not a good comment. >> >> <quote> >> Ralf Engelmann - A nice compact telezoom with nearly constant aperture >> and internal zooming, mechanically without problems, optically moderate >> to good quality with some problems full open. >> <quote> >> >> I would guess if it's cheap enough and you don't compare it to closely >> to your previous lens you should be all right. Who knows, there's >> enough sample variation in Pentax Zooms that it might even surprise you. >> >> Boris Liberman wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Folks, I just learned that SMC F 80-200 F4.7-5.6 does not change its >>> size while zooming like 100-300 lenses. The reviews I've been reading >>> are rather mixed. KEH has one of those really cheap and I think I >>> might wanna buy it. >>> >>> What is current opinion of the public about this lens? Anyone used it >>> on digital? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
