I know I haven't been following the PDML too closely over the past
while, but is purchasing a DS *really* Off Topic these days?

wow.

dk

On 11/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup. KEH. Good price. The prices on the *istD there are really low now, BTW.
> I wanted one with a faster write and a bigger buffer, so I went with the DS.
>
> I don't like shilly shallying around shopping. Actually I hate shopping, so I
> try to make up my mind fairly quickly.
>
> Not in my hands yet, but it will be fun to try out the Pentax glass I have
> when it arrives. I decided I could wait for SR until later when I will 
> probably
> get the K10D.
>
> More important to me now than SR is seeing if I can get as good results (or
> almost as good) with the DS and some older Pentax glass as I have gotten with
> my 300D and expensive Canon glass. This is not a minor point as it will take
> big bucks when the new Pentax lenses come out to duplicate the Canon kit I 
> have
> now. If I switch back completely, I can't outlay that much right away. It will
> definitely be incremental.  :-)
>
> Thanks for everyone's input.
>
> Cough. I guess I am back in the Pentax fold. Part way anyway. 1/2 Lightside,
> 1/2 Darkside. Like that Star Trek episode. Wonder if I will be as conflicted
> as that guy was?
>
> Marnie aka Doe  Probably.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to