On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 02:01:59PM -0700, Tom C wrote: > Hmmm.... I had thought that CF II always meant microdrive. What would be > the reasoning for making a non micro-drive CF II device?
One further data point: not all devices that support CF II media have power signals capable of handling the higher current demands of a Microdrive. Back in 2001, when I was shopping for a digital P&S, this was one of the features which I considered, and one that led to my final choice (a Canon Powershot G1). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
