Personally I love what I see (and that's what matters to me). If I should describe the signature of the camera I would use the word organic.
But I could also easily imagine pixel peepers ranting about the noise in the clouds in the South Mole picture. Judging from the samples I've seen so far, I think the camera will get mixed reviews. Some raving positive and some less positive. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Savage Sent: 29. november 2006 17:11 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: PESO: My first K10D shots G'day Everyone, As mentioned previously I picked up my K10D today. After work I spent an hour familiarising myself & dialing it in, I then headed down to the harbour to take it for a test spin. (Apologies for the lack of a proper web page. I'm tired and can't be stuffed putting one together right now :-) Fire Hose K10D, FA 77mm f1.8 Ltd., ISO 100, 1/1000 @ f4.5 (800x536 pix ~115kb) <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP0013_2.jpg> (3176x2126 pix ~1M) <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP0013_lrg.jpg> South Mole: K10D, FA 77mm f1.8 Ltd., ISO 200, 1/750 @ f4 (800x536 pix ~91kb) <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP0022.jpg> (3872x2952 pix ~1.3M) <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP0022_lrg.jpg> Lighthouse Entrance: K10D, FA 77mm f1.8 Ltd., ISO 200, 1/200 @ f5 (800x536 pix ~109kb) <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP0027.jpg> (3872x2952 pix ~1.3M) <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP0027_lrg.jpg> The light was a bit ordinary but I think they turned out alright. Comments, criticisms, yawns all welcome. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
