P. J. Alling wrote:

>I decided to re-visit a few more PESOs that people have suggested 
>changes to, in the past few months.  The most recent come first. in this 
>group.
>
>The first a few suggested would look better if part of the subjects out 
>of focus hair was cropped out so I decided on a square crop. 
>
>Before:
>http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_rose.html
>After:
>*http://tinyurl.com/yhqnyk
>
Looks better to me by a lot - but then I'm the one who suggested the crop :)



>
>Next a full frame capture of a Beach Rose taken last summer, it was 
>mentioned that it would look better with softer lighting, well I 
>couldn't do that but I was able to soften it a bit in photo shop, 
>(cropped it to 4:5 aspect ratio as well).
>
>Before:
>http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_beachrose.html
>After:
>http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_beachroseii.html
>

Well I like this one much better too

>
>Finally one I haven't really reworked so much as re-photographed.  It 
>was suggested that I take the time to shoot these abandoned Gas Pumps 
>the way I'd do a portrait session.  I've been back a number of times to 
>do just that.  Some may remember the original, (I can't find it right 
>now).  I decided I like this view a bit better.
>
>http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_pumpsii.html
>
>As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
>
I like the geometry, the subject matter, but the light is wrong for this 
kind of shot...
makes it a bit too busy, too much going on.  Keep going back :)

ann

>*
>
>  
>



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to