I dont know why he bothered to put a conclusion with his opinion on the review. The data is what people are most interested in. IMO he seems to be highly biased towards Canon anyways. Just look at the conclusion of this camera:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong7/page17.asp He does a huge amount of complaining about this camera, and yet still gives it a "highly recommended". If it had been any other brand, IMO it would not have received this endorsement. rg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > As I said in a thread on the DPReview forum ... I could care less > what Phil Askey's opinion about a camera is. All i look at review > sites for is pictures of the camera and listings of features and > functions. > > The rest I prefer to evaluate for myself. > > G > > On Dec 4, 2006, at 8:19 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: > > >>For some reason people seem to dislike these reviews. It could be the >>reason is even valid. >> >>Yet, if you want to get a comprehensive explanation as to how to use >>the camera and generally get rather thorough examination of it >>performed for you and very well documented - here you have it. I for >>one value DPReview highly. Naturally, one has to read what they write >>critically, yet I think DPReview is extremely valuable resource. > > > -- Someone handed me a picture and said, "This is a picture of me when I was younger." Every picture of you is when you were younger. "...Here's a picture of me when I'm older." Where'd you get that camera man? - Mitch Hedberg -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
