Bob S. wrote:
> > I guess it's a matter of definition of "warning",
> > but by any reasonable use of the language, in
> > the case of the two bombs on Hiroshima and
> > Nagasaki respectively, there was no warning
> > that would have given the civilians a chance
> > to escape. More than 100 000 civilians were
> > killed there.
> > Lasse,
> It was a horrible event, but don't paint us as evil monsters for doing this
Please tell me exactly whereby I have painted you as evil monsters?
I have not in a word passed any judgement on the events that I mentioned.
I did not bring up this issue. I was merely responding to a statement to the list made
by Tom R..
He said:
"We may have done many things we can not be proud of, but we have never attacked
purely cilivian
targets without warning."
I don't think that this statement is accurate. That's why I responded, just like I
think that anyone of a different opinion is entitled to.
That's all.
Btw. If anyone feel like reading an eyewitness report on what it was like when the
bomb hit Hiroshima, please see:
http://www.wtj.com/archives/hiroshima.htm
Lasse
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .