Tom C. wrote: > None of your message replies have "Re:" on them anymore. > <snip> > While this is not a major issue for me, I do (and I assume some others) > frequently use the "Re:" to determine which posts I click on and read and > which I don't, especially after there has been a number of responses and > the > thread starts to go OT.
Joe, dunno if you've noticed this thread, but I wanted to chime in. Your lack of "re:"s in your responses is frustrating. Besides the fact that it screws with some mail readers, every time I see a post with no "re:" or equivalent in the subject line, I think it's a new thread and click on it. Since I generally only skim PDML mail, I find this frustrating, and it makes me want to set up a filter to deal with it. What causes this lack of "re:"? If it's a conscious choice on your part, I'd like to suggest you put it in, at least for PDML messages. If it's your email program, perhaps you could look into your program's settings. You're the only person I've encountered with this issue, so I'm very curious what its cause is. John -- http://www.neovenator.com http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
