Paul Stenquist wrote: >Yes, for that kind of work, jpeg is better. I did my 300 or so wedding >pics in RAW, but I don't do this often. If I was trying to earn money >shooting things like weddings, schools or Santa pics, I would be >shooting jpeg as well. IN OTHER WORDS, YOU'RE RIGHT! :-))
I agree on everything but weddings. In my thankfully brief experience shooting weddings I encountered all kinds of light sources: Daylight, fluorescent, incandescent, candlelight, daylight-through-stained-glass. Individually and in myriad combinations. I gave up on manual white balance in the first half hour of my first wedding - I found I just couldn't stop to change WB as often as I needed to. AWB and RAW is the way to go. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
