I'm not a heavy flash user ...

With a film camera, having TTL flash metering was useful, without it  
one tends to waste a lot of film.

With a digital camera, a fully manual flash seems perfectly fine: I  
shoot a couple of test frames, check them with the histogram, and  
just leave those settings in place. I usually remember them easily  
and just set the camera for similar situations when next I pick up  
the flash unit. I use the same Sunpak 383 but most often leave it in  
manual, non-metered mode and just set up the exposure with the power  
control and aperture. I can't see how this is difficult for when one  
might need a ring flash ... What situation are you shooting that  
doesn't allow a couple of test exposures?

Where a dedicated flash would be most useful for me is for changing  
daylight: I could dial in -1.5 to -1 EV flash compensation and let it  
work the fill requirements nicely. That's why I have the Pentax  
AF540FGZ on my B&H wishlist, but haven't punched the button to order  
it yet.

G


On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Perry Pellechia wrote:

> It is common knowledge that the K10D does not have the capability to
> do TTL flash metering.   While there are options to buy dedicated PTTL
> strobes for mounting on the hotshoe, there are no options currently
> for a PTTL ring flash.
>
> I do not use flash very much and for general work my Sunpak 383 in
> "auto" mode does a decent job.  However, I used Sunpak Auto DX-12R
> Ringflash with the PT-2D Pentax TTL module for a lot of close up work.
>   It does not have an Auto mode, nor would that really work for close
> up work.  So I am stuck using it in full manual mode and adjusting
> each exposure by trial and error.
>
> I have asked the folks at Sunpak (ToCAD) via email if they are
> planning on a PTTL module, but have not gotten a response yet.  Anyone
> know if Pentax is planning on selling a PTTL capable ring flash?
>
> I guess this is one reason to keep the *istD.  For extreme close up
> work it required dialing in quite a bit of exposure compensation but
> was fairly consistent after initial adjustment.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to