LOL ... You will always find *something* to fuss over, won't you? ;-) Specifications for these kinds of things always have an allowable range of variation. .2mm (~ .008 inch) is not unheard of for this kind of device as a sensible range.
Just for amusement, I pulled out the Sandisk Ultra II and Transcend 150x cards, measured them with a caliper. They are identical in every dimension. That seems to indicate that Lexar's die is on the narrow side of the SD card specification range compared to the Sandisk/ Transcend dies. G On Dec 11, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote: > I've just taken delivery of two of these. Some list members recommend > them as good value. They were certainly much less expensive than > the 2GB > Lexar 133x card that I have. > > When I put them into the K10D, I encounter just a little resistance > about 3/4 of the way in. Then, with a little click, the card slides > in. > The Lexar card doesn't do this. > > Comparing the Transcend and Lexar cards I find that the cases are, > believe it or not, slightly different in size. The Transcend case is > very slightly wider than the Lexar--about 0.1-0.2 mm or so. The other > dimensions appear the same. I would have thought that the > specification > for an SD card's case wouldn't allow for such variation. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
