On 12/15/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Savage wrote: > > >At 02:26 PM 15/12/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > >>15 is still jail bait. Even "classic cars" have to be at least 20 yrs > old > >>here in FL to get a classic auto tag. And even thats pushing the > envelope > >>in my opinion... jco > > > >Hence the term, "Modern Classic" > > Here in PA, a "classic" motor vehicle need only be 10 years old if it > was not produced in large numbers. The FA*200/2.8 certainly qualifies > in that regard - I've never even seen one on person.
I had the good fortune to try Rob's when he was over. Sweet. :-) As I mentioned I had one on order that I canceled when I got a FA 80-200 f2.8 of eBay. In hindsight I think I should have got the FA 200 f2.8 instead. I tend to use the 80-200 at the 200mm end the most so the reduced weight of the 200 would have been better for me. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
