Adam Maas wrote: > Christian wrote: > >>Cory Papenfuss wrote: >> >> >> >>> Yeah... I give Canon 6 months before they introduce in-body >>>anti-shake. I think they'll have to to compete. Given that probably 90% >>>of the DSLR buyers never buy another lens other than the kit lens, it's a >>>great selling point. >> >> >>I think they'll just make all the CKLs (crappy kit lenses) IS from now >>on. They have one ( the 17-85 USM IS) already. Combine that with the >>atrocious 70-300 f4-5.6 IS and you have a full range of image-stabilized >>focal lengths for your "average" digiRebel user. >> > > > The 70-300's actually quite decent, especially on the 1.6x crop bodies, I > think you have it mixed up with the 75-300, which is a coke bottle.
A friend bought the 70-300 IS and sold it after a couple of days. soft soft SOFT. Aweful lens. The 17-85 IS is supposed to be pretty decent. -- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
