Shel,

>From my point of view, you've always been the jamoke.

Tom C.




>From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: K10D review online
>Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:57:58 -0800
>
>Is this the same reviewer who is often lambasted here for not doing
>adequate and repeatable tests, the same one who has been criticized for not
>understanding, or at least not mentioning, how the Pentax JPEG is set up to
>work, and who is often criticized for showing a bias towards Canon, and
>who, as it has been suggested, is beholden to Canon for at least some
>financial support?
>
>I wonder just how much time Mr.Askey spends with each camera that he tests,
>and just how knowledgeable he really is.
>
>As for those here that rely on these tests - perhaps reports is a better
>word to use - and use these reports to further praise or criticize the
>cameras (per their own biases or inclinations), may I strongly suggest you
>get ahold of the camera(s) in question, use them a bit, and then make your
>own judgements rather than letting some jamoke half way around the world
>make up your mind for you.
>
>Shel
>
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Tom C
>
> > It's amazing that you're amazed really.  Hey this reminds me of the 
>title
>of
> > my favorite song...
> >
> > I forthrightly acknowledged that I do not have a K10D, so what is the
>point
> > of your redundant restatement of it?
> >
> > I am disappointed that a reviewer with far more photogrpahic and
>technical
> > knowledge than myself, along with far more capacity to perform at least
> > pseduo-scientific tests, finds that the camera (at least his sample of
>it)
> > is nothing really special compared to the competition in the way we were
> > lead to believe it would stand out, which was greater dynamic range.
>
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to