Since the size of an uncompressed PEF from my DS is pretty similar to the size of a compressed DNG from the K10D, I assume testing speed with an uncompressed PEF from my DS could give me a pretty good idea about what to expect.
Does it make sense to you now? If it doesn't I guess it is because I'm tired. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: 17. desember 2006 03:03 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Dinged by DNG in the K10D? (going a bit OT) I'm not sure what your concern is and what "converting PEFs" will tell you. Pentax Photo Browser/Lab is as slow as glaciers snoozing. If your computer can handle processing *ist D/DS/DL RAW files, it will also work fine for K10D RAW files, either PEF or DNG format in whatever tools you enjoy using that can digest them. Any difference in speed is insignificant unless you're processing 100 RAW files at a time. Godfrey On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:39 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote: > Thank you Paul. > My hope is that my system is up for the task. What I can do to find an > answer before actually buyibg the camera is to compare with converting > PEF's. Judging from your answer this test would give me a pretty > good idea. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
