James, My apologies. I hope your camera isn't broken, and you're just mis-interpreting your results. Regards, Bob S.
On 12/16/06, J and K Messervy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "The sky is falling, the sky is falling!" cried Chicken Little. > > or so goes the children's tale. > > > > I got tired of listening to all these 'nervious nellies'. > > I got tired of looking at movies of shaking sensors. > > I've got the sensor cleaner turned off, so I don't feel any shaking, > > or more specifically any shake reduction on the K10D. > > > > So is it working or not? I shot a test this morning, see below... > > I used the K10D and DA16-45mm at F4 and 1/8th of a second. > > > > http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/ShakeReductionPentaxK10D > > > > The bubbles in the water are much sharper with SR On. > > > > Now think about the amount of movement the sensor did. > > Not very much! No wonder I can't feel anything. > > > > Do us all a favor and test your results before you whine. > > > I take offence at this. No need to be a nasty b*tch thanks very much. My > shake reduction sometimes works and sometimes doesn't. This has been > bourne out by both watching the sensor move (or not) AND by the photographic > results. Having said that, I love the camera and SR is not that important > to me, so the sky is NOT falling, it just appears that the occasional unit > has glitches...which is to be expected with a new model. > > It is a FACT that my SR is intermittant in its operation. I wish that > wasn't the case, but I'm loathe to send it away for rectification as I don't > want to be without the camera. > > James > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
