>Would the shot saved and printed as a JPEG still look as good against a >well > printed RAW shot?
Obviously, without a side by side evaluation, we'll never know. Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: K10D review online > On 17/12/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't agree, as anyone who was @ GFM in 2005 will attest. I had a large >> size portfolio of digital captures (13"X19") all in JPEG. The response to >> the images was satisfying to me. No one questioned the capture mode. > > I don't dispute what you suggest. However I would like to have heard > the consensus if the viewers were also presented with the same well > crafted image which had been captured RAW then post precessed to > maximise the image dynamics and colour gamut and printed on a printer > with a wider gamut than either sRGB or Adobe RGB for comparison. Would > the shot saved and printed as a JPEG still look as good against a well > printed RAW shot? > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
