Not all movies are about a good story, some are about
completely different things but can still be quite
entertaining or even better than a film with a just good
story. Many movies are very visual rather
than narative. A good HDTV will never hurt the story,
but a crappy ntsc will hurt the visuals.
jco


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adam Maas
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 5:49 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: It's snowing in hell --OT


J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> I dont see how a high quality moving pictures could
> be "boring" to some how enjoys high quality **still** pictures. Motion

> picturs can be an art form, and as such some of them can be greatly 
> more appreciated and enjoyed with signifigantly better picture 
> quality. Enough so to the point that boredom
> can be transformed into artistic communication between
> the filmmaker and the viewer.
> 

If it wasn't boring, the story would have grabbed you already. Story 
matters, the visuals are in support of the story and can only rarely 
support the movie or show on their own.

> I cant see how many of you can be so concerned about MP, color space, 
> color gamut, raw vs. jpeg, color balance, etc. and then say it doesnt 
> matter that the old crappy ntsc picture is far worse than what HD 
> provides. These are the very same things.

Because I care about the story, not the pretty. With my pictures, I rely

on the image itself to do all the telling, with TV it's only part of the

story, and even then not the most improtant part.

> 
> HDTV is way better,
> and if you check the current prices, very affordable
> to the average person, not only the rich and famous.
>  I posted this three times already:
> they cost less than a regular tv's did 10 years ago
> of the same size screen but the HDTV picture quality
> blows away those 10 yr old sets. There has never
> been a better time to upgrade a tv than today if
> you still are watching ntsc.
> 
> 
> jco
> 

$2000 TV's aren't 'very affordable', they're 'barely within the range of

reason'. If I had that sort of cash lying around to spend on a TV, I'd 
have a Canon 5D and some Leica R lenses instead.

-Adam

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to