I studied them for a few minutes. After applying the same level of sharpening to both, I found that the K resolved considerably more detail than the D in the test with the 50mm lens. In both tests with the 200mm lens, it was harder for me to discern any real difference in detail, which suggests that the lens may be the limiting factor here. Noise at 1600 appeared to be approximately the same. I would be hard pressed to pick a winner. I'd love to see a similar comparison of RAW files, where in-camera processing doesn't affect the equation. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > JPEG files straight out of the cameras with same lens on both. > The file names say something and full Exif inside. Untouched. > > FA 1.7/50mm (200 or 100 ISO): > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/D_50mm_200.jpg > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/K10_50mm_100.jpg > > Sigma EX 70-200 @ 200mm (200 or 100 ISO): > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/D_200mm_200.jpg > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/K10_200mm_100.jpg > > Sigma EX 70-200 @ 200mm (1600 ISO): > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/D_200mm_1600.jpg > http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/K10_200mm_1600.jpg > > Apply some unsharp mask and draw your own conclusions. > > Dario > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
