This reply post is undecipherable by me and I have
read it repeatedly.. What the heck does it
mean? What you trying to say? I am totally
bewildered by it. If you dont want to decode it
for me, thats cool but I sure as hell havent
got a clue what your communiqué means on
this one. 

jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 10:18 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The cause of the controversy


I am only sorry that some have encouraged this by suggesting that  
it's okay. Shame on you. I will have nothing more to say. I hope  
others will do the same.
Paul


On Dec 19, 2006, at 9:56 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:

> I hate to say it but GRAYWOLF is sorta busted
> and my statements on that topic were
> not wrong at all. That set clearly is stamped 1989
> and he initally claimed it was from 1983. I told
> you all that in 1983 you couldnt get
> any sets with video inputs on them except
> on top line Sony and I stated that the set
> most likely did not have any video inputs
> or was made at a later date, and there
> it is folks " 1 9 8 9 " stamped right on it
> not 1983 as initially reported and discussed
> and being told wrong by him when there
> is nothing wrong with what I said at all.
> Maybe we had a mixup on the date, I dont
> recall 1989 ever being mentioned, only 1983, but I stated 1983 in my 
> reply posts and he didnt correct the discussion to 1989 like he should

> have. Six years makes a on what a set could have
> and couldnt have as far as features.
>
> P.S. I get a big kick out of the air/circuitry
> ratio on the rear view shot! Unbelieveable.
> jco
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> Adam Maas
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 9:21 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: The cause of the controversy
>
>
> graywolf wrote:
>> http://www.graywolfphoto.com/digital/TV.html
>>
>
> Looks like a nice unit. I miss those console TV's, you don't need a TV
> stand with them.
>
> -Adam
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to