>I do not believe anyone can see the difference on a 27-32 inch job. Wanna bet? We all know a guy who could.
;+) Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: The cause of the controversy > HO! HO! HO! Merry Christmas, Eveyone! > > Actually the picture is pretty good, Cotty, now that I have it adjusted. > One of the things that has not been thought of is that a 27in analog TV > viewed from across the room has pretty good resolution. Viewed up close > the new HD stuff is better, but from across the room? I do not believe > anyone can see the difference on a 27-32 inch job. At least, standing > back 10-12 feet from the display sets at Wal-Mart, I can not. > > > Cotty wrote: >> On 19/12/06, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >>> http://www.graywolfphoto.com/digital/TV.html >> >> The picture's terrible! That looks like a National Geographic >> documentary about some guy shooting living rooms, but the contrast is so >> bad on the screen it's difficult to tell. I reckon you need a new TV >> Graywolf. Apparently the HDTV system is much better anf comes highly >> recommended, and if you don't agree you're WRONG WRONG WRONG! >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
