It seems so doesn't it.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Having it rectified will be a pain in the ass.
> Paul
> On Dec 20, 2006, at 6:32 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>
>> If you "lose" the camera won't it be difficult to verify the problem
>> and
>> have it rectified?
>>
>> skye wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/20/06, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On a couple of occasions, when the K10D shutter is released in
>>>>> (verified) single frame mode, it might fire two or three times.
>>>>> Sounds
>>>>> much like the continuous rate. This AM it was three times, but only
>>>>> with the first release.
>>>>> Anyone else had this happen?
>>>>> The up side is, I'm not wasting film.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Jack, with passage of time, roughly a year after I got it, my *istD
>>>> developed a strange habit. It would fire twice (and very rarely
>>>> thrice)
>>>> although it was in single frame mode. I doubt that my trigger finger
>>>> is
>>>> that shaky or that (trigger) happy. Although this thing does not
>>>> bother
>>>> me to the slightest - at worst I have to delete some files. But I do
>>>> chimp.
>>>>
>>>> HTH.
>>>>
>>>> Boris
>>>>
>>>>
>>> This has happened to me too. The problem developed after I got it back
>>> from the last cleaning. I don't have time to lose the camera for any
>>> amount of time, so I just put up with it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
>> --Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
