According to the rules of some of the competitions and shows I've
entered, you're a professional if you derive more than half of your
income from photography.
Paul
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
> Not to re-open the thread, really; more to air my musings
> and talk about something other than Current Events. (I'm
> on another mailing list where that's not off-topic, so I've
> been getting _that_ out of my system over there, mostly.
> Without that other outlet, I'd probably be joining in here.)
>
> We've discussed it to death here and figured out that to
> at least some extent the word "professional" means different
> things depending on context and speaker. Okay, I wonder how
> AAA defines it...
>
> I spotted a photo contest in a magazine, and noticed in the
> rules that "professional photographers" were among those
> not eligible. Ack! I don't earn a living with my photography,
> and I'm a long time between sales/jobs, but I _have_ done
> shoots for money and I do try to sell prints. I wonder
> whether I'm considered "pro" in the context of this contest?
>
> (I'll see if there's a phone number or email address to
> contact the contest officials. If not, I guess I'll send
> 'em a letter.)
>
> -- Glenn
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
