Just another advantage for putting IS in the lenses, rather than he body. If what your saying is true, and it sounds like it could be, how does the current SR work with the current lenses that are only designed to cover APS? Do you have to use only FF lenses to use SR on the current APS format DSLR bodies? jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Savage Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 9:12 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Official Full Frame Pentax Rumor - Technical Limitations of KMount? The main argument at the moment is SR, as it is in the K100/10D, wouldn't work. Supposedly current full frame Pentax lenses projected image circle wouldn't be large enough to cover the moving sensor. As some people think that SR is more useful than a FF sensor, that's their reason for thinking Pentax FF is a pipe dream. Time will tell. Cheers, Dave P.S. Welcome. On 12/21/06, Tom Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi: > > Im kinda' new here, but one of the things I picked up in passing is > that the K-mount might be fundamentally incompatible with a full-frame > DSLR? Or did I miss something? If I didnt, please explain to me what > the issue is, as I was under the impression that if you put a sensor > the size of a 35mm frame in the same place in reference to the lens as > a 35mm frame of lens, it would all work out just peachy. Why not? I > hope not, as I am hoping that the bigger sensor will give the quantum > physicists more to work with to give us all the resolution we can eat > AND bring dynamic range more in line with film. From my understanding, > this is likely an either/or proposition with an APC sensor. Cant have > both. > > TIA > -Tom in SC > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
