I haven't taken out my micrometer, but this exactly what I was thinking as well.
Tom C. >From: "Bob Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Official Full Frame Pentax Rumor - Technical Limitations of >KMount? >Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:54:07 -0600 > >I'm having trouble with identifying Shake Reduction as a problem for >full frame sensor cameras. Everybody is talking like the shake >reduction movement is centimeters of travel. Look at some of the side >by side comparisons. Remember some of the old time discussions about >'circle of confusion' at 1/1000th of an inch. Shake reduction is >going to be a movement of very tiny proportions. 1 to 3 pixels on a >sensor that is 3000+ pixels wide. If our full frame lenses can't deal >with that small amount of moving or miss positioning, I would be >really surprised. Bring on the full frame! >Comments or corrections to this logic??? >Regards, Bob S, > >On 12/21/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The main argument at the moment is SR, as it is in the K100/10D, > > wouldn't work. Supposedly current full frame Pentax lenses projected > > image circle wouldn't be large enough to cover the moving sensor. > > > > As some people think that SR is more useful than a FF sensor, that's > > their reason for thinking Pentax FF is a pipe dream. > > > > Time will tell. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dave > > > > P.S. Welcome. > > > > On 12/21/06, Tom Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > Im kinda' new here, but one of the things I picked up in passing is >that > > > the K-mount might be fundamentally incompatible with a full-frame >DSLR? > > > Or did I miss something? If I didnt, please explain to me what the >issue > > > is, as I was under the impression that if you put a sensor the size of >a > > > 35mm frame in the same place in reference to the lens as a 35mm frame >of > > > lens, it would all work out just peachy. Why not? I hope not, as I am > > > hoping that the bigger sensor will give the quantum physicists more to > > > work with to give us all the resolution we can eat AND bring dynamic > > > range more in line with film. From my understanding, this is likely an > > > either/or proposition with an APC sensor. Cant have both. > > > > > > TIA > > > -Tom in SC > > > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > [email protected] > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
