Quoting Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Dec 23, 2006, at 7:51, David J Brooks wrote: >> If the FA 70-200 is really $250 to fix, i won't bother, as they can be >> found for 1/2 that, and sell as a parts lens >> > > I missed it - what's wrong with the 70-200??
I had it on the D,sitting on the dock, by the bay.<vbg> at the camp this past October, taking pictures of my buddies dog in the water. Its a floating dock, and he got up to get something, which tilted the dock to my right. The rear leg of the plastic chair broke and i fell backwards, putting my hand out as instict would . Unfortunatly the hand had a camera in it, and the lens took the hit, full force, on the dock and bend the inner barrel quite a bit. I paid $125.00 for it, so i don;t want to pay $250 to fix it. Could be a good parts lens of maybe someone might want to try and fix it. Dave > > -Charles > > -- > Charles Robinson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Minneapolis, MN > http://charles.robinsontwins.org > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
