RAW is essentially identical. JPEG's from the K100D are significantly better for pixel-peeping (and noise).
-Adam Paul Stenquist wrote: > *ist series and K100 image quality should be virtually identical, > since the sensor is the same, and I suspect the processing engine is > similar as well. The *istD has better build quality than the K100, > but the write speed is slower and I think the buffer is smaller as > well. The *istDS write speed and buffer are comparable to the K100D I > believe. The K10D is a completely different story with faster write > speed, larger buffer and higher resolution. > Paul > On Dec 23, 2006, at 2:57 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > >> I have heard a lot of comparisons of >> the *istD series cameras with the K10D. >> I am curious though, other than the >> "SR" system, how do these K100 series >> cameras compare to the *istD cameras >> in image quality? >> >> Essentially the same? >> >> jco >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
