I know that, but was commenting on the fact that it was a K version not 
the A that Cotty mutilated to force into an unholy mating to his 
darkside spawned infernal photographic device.

Paul Stenquist wrote:
> There are both K and A versions of the 15/3.5. In fact, i believe  
> there are two different K versions.
> paul
> On Dec 23, 2006, at 5:40 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>   
>> I think the 15mm was a K not A, one of the few things I find  
>> forgivable
>> as it would be much easier to restore full K functionality someday...
>>
>> Adam Maas wrote:
>>     
>>> Peter Fairweather wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> The answer to your question is the lenses.
>>>>
>>>> In a moment of madness I looked at some of the C****n lens  
>>>> reviews to
>>>> see what was to be gained if anything by switching to the full frame
>>>> 5D. The favourite wide lens was the sigma 12-24, which I have in a
>>>> Pentax mount. I didn't fancy paying £1000 for a 16-35 Canon zoom  
>>>> with
>>>> worse barrel distortion than the Sigma. Their 14mm was twice the  
>>>> price
>>>> of the Pentax and not that well thought of. The 20mm prime was
>>>> indifferent although at least not astronomically expensive. the  
>>>> 24 1.4
>>>> was excellent but only when stopped down and cost another £1000. The
>>>> 24 2.8 was OK at best and so on
>>>>
>>>> Makes the advantage of a full frame sensor disappear at the wide  
>>>> end.
>>>> I even thought of taking a hacksaw to the Pentax mounts and  
>>>> converting
>>>> them to Canon.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone ever tried that? ;> ;>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> It's called Cotty-izing a lens, as Cotty has done exactly that to  
>>> an A
>>> 15 and A* 85 for use on his 1DmII. Easier to do now that  
>>> Cameraquest is
>>> selling a K-EF adaptor (You'll still need to trim the stop-down lever
>>> off to clear the mirror on a FF or 1.3x crop body, but the lever  
>>> clears
>>> the mirror on EF-S bodies).
>>>
>>> Plenty of people do this to get better Zeiss, Olympus, Nikon or Leica
>>> wides onto the nice canon FF bodies. I personally have the Leica  
>>> and M42
>>> adaptors and intend on getting a Nikon adaptor as well (I have a  
>>> Canon
>>> film body and may get a 5D if I ever get the cash, I've got an  
>>> extensve
>>> Nikon MF collection that I'd like to use on FF)
>>>
>>> -Adam
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> -- 
>> Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
>>                      --Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
                        --Albert Einstein



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to