I believe I am a bit emotional about this. 56 days of rain scares me. This said. You where not going for me, to get me, I know that. So don't worry. I just felt you did not direct the point of my message, but only directed me. Hope you understand what the difference. I'm saying that I was not personally offended.
I agree that we mean little in the greater scheme. But we have a saying here; many small streams makes a large flood. Some times that's comforting, some times it is scary. But I believe there is a truth in it. BTW. This is an odd Christmas for me. I'm partly at home, partly ay work, partly here. But I will get some days off between Christmas and New Year. I'm looking forward to that. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of graywolf Sent: 24. desember 2006 22:41 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Doomsday is coming upon us? Also a hollyday wish I am sorry you took my comment as a personal attack. It was not meant to be. I was trying to make the point that we humans are not all that powerful. We mean little in the greater scheme of things. We get to thinking that we have more effect than we have. There is a name for that in German, I think, Weltscherz (?). It seems to be kind of a normal human emotion. Tim Øsleby wrote: > Tom. > I'm offline now at work, and I am wondering if this message of mine came out > a bit too strong. > I felt you went for the man instead of the ball, and then I did the same in > return. That's a stupid thing to do. Sorry about that. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
