Sorry, Ken, I should have made it clear that that was my translation of their five minute long summary of their findings. But if your question was true, the upper 50% of the population would be in real trouble.
Also, do not confuse knowledge with intelligence. They often go hand in hand, but not always. I once knew a fellow who could recite everything they had taught him in school --thirty years later--, but he did have a hard time tying his shoes because that require a certain amount of understanding. Quote recall quiz: Who was it that said, "An exceptional memory is often a sign of feeble mindedness"? K.Takeshita wrote: > On 1/02/07 8:43 PM, "graywolf", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes this third neurologist's profound $3000 opinion was, "Duh, I dunno!" >> Which confirms the second's professional opinion. The first was sure she >> knew exactly what the problem was, only the treatment did not help a >> bit. The only consolation is that I do seem to be getting better, but it >> is so slow that I have to look back a year or more to see the improvement. > > Don't they have to have higher IQ than patients in this sort of business, > no? > Are you sure which one is diagnosing which? :-). > > Ken > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
