I find that the D is also quite noisy when underexposed at high ISO. Perhaps somewhat less, but I can't say for sure without testing. It's close. Paul On Jan 3, 2007, at 11:59 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I saw some blue channel noise when I shot at 1600 ISO and underexposed > too much. It seemed less forgiving than the *istD for that situation. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Wednesday, January 3, 2007, 7:29:28 PM, you wrote: > > PS> I've only been able to generate noise when I underexpose by a stop > or > PS> so at high ISO with longish exposures. > PS> Paul > PS> On Jan 3, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >>> No, not me. I haven't found much noise as yet. My longest exposures >>> tend to be in the .5 to 1 second range so far. >>> >>> Godfrey >>> >>> >>> On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:14 AM, David Savage wrote: >>> >>>>> From John Celio >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/pdml%40pdml.net/msg369265.html >>>> >>>> Godfrey (I think) posted something a few weeks back as well, but I >>>> can't find it. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
