Supposedly Microsoft has exposed more OS features through the API in
WinXP. I don't know for sure, I haven't bothered to delve that deeply
in a very long time. I could try, I suppose to get newer Adobe
products to work on W2K, but I'd need newer Adobe Products, and a test
machine, (which I don't have presently), in case I screwed something up
seriously.
Mark Roberts wrote:
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>
>> I'm using W2K All the power of WinXP, just as stable, No stupid
>> Microsoft tricks. (At least no more stupid Microsoft tricks than
>> Win98). It works well, with no muss or fuss. A rarity in the high
>> tech world. Of course Adobe no longer writes software that
>> supports it.
>>
>
> I wonder if there's any technical reason why Adobe can't make their new
> software run on Win2k of if they're deliberately making it so it
> *won't* run on that OS. From what I've experienced of Adobe I suspect
> the latter. I would be surprised if a sufficiently skilled hack could
> make CS3 install on Win2k.
>
>
>
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
