Thanks Dave. I dont see much distortion at 17mm, but its hard to tell since there are not many lines to allow a clear conclusion.
rg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > By 17mm the distortion is pretty much non-existent. > > Here are a couple of examples of mine (taken in the exact same position): > > 10mm > > <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/IMGP5146_1.jpg> > > 17mm > > <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/IMGP5149.jpg> > > HTH > > Dave > > > On 1/6/07, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I've seen some nice pics from this lens. W. Hamler's recent "Hot Dog >>Heaven" is a prime, err... zoom example. >> >>My question is related to its fishiness. I've heard that the lens is a >>fisheye at 10mm, but loses its "fishiness" as you head towards 17mm, so >>that it looks like a rectilinear at 17mm. Anyone have any experience >>that could confirm/disprove this? >> >>Thanks, >> >>Gonz > > -- Someone handed me a picture and said, "This is a picture of me when I was younger." Every picture of you is when you were younger. "...Here's a picture of me when I'm older." Where'd you get that camera man? - Mitch Hedberg -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
