The detail & sharpness everywhere is improved :-) As you say, not surprising, but the 3200 for what it cost does an OK job.
Cheers, Dave On 1/6/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's a pic I rescanned on my friend's Imacon. I treated it somewhat > differently as well, both in terms of the crop and the rendering, but I > still think there's a distinct difference. Note the detail in the > background trees. > > The imacon scan: > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5416945&size=lg > > The Epson 3200 scan: > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2609820&size=lg > > No surprise, but mildly interesting perhaps. > Paul -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
