DOH... I wouldn't have revived this thread. I thought I was reading  
messages in order of date received. Unfortunately, I had clicked the  
threads button. Enogh of this.
Paul
On Jan 7, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

> This is in keeping with what I've read. There were numerous
> "gospels," Jerome allegedly chose the documents which were written by
> those who were closest to Jesus. Biblical research can be very
> interesting. If nothing more, it's an important part of world history.
> Paul
> On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:29 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
>
>> John Sessoms wrote:
>>>> From:
>>>> frank theriault
>>>> On 1/3/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Just one side point... neither purgatory or a burning hell are
>>>>> taught
>>>>> by the
>>>>> Bible. So yes a strange, in fact, false logic.<snip>
>>>> Indeed!
>>>>
>>>> The concept of purgatory is Roman Catholic dogma (perhaps other
>>>> Christian sects believe in it, I don't know).  What has Catholicism
>>>> ever had to do with the Bible?
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> frank, recovering catholic
>>>
>>> Wasn't it a bunch of Roman Catholic priests who decided what
>>> would be
>>> in and what would not be in the Bible?
>>>
>>
>> Pretty much, for the New Testament at least. St Jerome was the guy  
>> who
>> put it together and it was approved initially in 392AD and finally in
>> 397AD at a pair of Church Councils.
>>
>> The Old Testament is different. The Catholic Church and the Orthodox
>> Churches use the Septaguint Canon, which originated between 300 and
>> 100
>> BC and was in common use amongst hebrews until after 200AD, when
>> Jewish
>> use moved towards the Masoretic Canon, which is the basis for the
>> shorter Protestant Old Testament and dates in it's full form to
>> between
>> 700 and 1000AD. Note the Catholic Church uses their translation of  
>> the
>> Septaguint Canon, part of the Vulgate Bible, while the Orthodox
>> Churches
>> are split between the Vulgate and the original Septaguint texts in
>> Greek.
>>
>> The 7 books in the Septaguint that aren't used by the Protestant
>> Churches are the Deuterocanonical Books, originally written in Greek.
>> These are often confused with the Apocrypha, which are the
>> approcimately
>> 150 books which claim to be Canonical for the New Testament. The
>> Catholic Church determined them to not be Canonical, but they do fall
>> into other categories (From outright blasphemy to being considered
>> works
>> of the 'Doctors of the Church', the great theological writers of the
>> Catholic Church).
>>
>> It's interesting to note that Luther did not accept the traditional
>> New
>> Testament, notably referring to 2 James as 'an epistle of straw'. He
>> attempted unsuccessfully to have 7 books removed from common use. All
>> were from the post-Acts section of the New Testament.
>>
>> Yeah, I researched this a fair bit a while back, out of historical
>> interest.
>>
>> -Adam
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to