I have the 24/2 and the 28-70/4 and i usually carry them both in my camera
bag. Even though there is only 4mm difference between 24 and 28 i find it to
be quite significant when shooting and its nice and fast for a 24mm.
Of late when shooting with two bodies i have the 28-70/4 on my MZ-S and 24/2
on my MX. the 24/2 is quite nice to manually focus (the 28-70/4 sucks to
manuually focus).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Wide angle zoom advice requested
> >Considering only the optical qualities, what is your advice?
>
> I think the best primes are still better than the best zooms. Otherwise,
> there was no need to make primes anymore. The FA*24/2 is an excellent
lens,
> but doesn't seem to fit well in your package since you have the 35/2 and
> 28-70/4 already. Perhaps a FA20/2.8 might be considered too. Personally, I
> use primes only except the SMC-A70-210/4, but expect to switch lenses
often
> (might not work for everyone).
>
> regards,
> Alan Chan
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
