You are an idiot if you cant even understand the topic. I didnt post anything about AF lenses, I posted the differences in Pentax MF lenses and with MF lenses the MF "feel" is important because thats a key user interface to the lens. If you dont use MF lenses, then you would best be served by staying out of the discussion.
Regarding lenses, I never "waxed estatic" over them, I was asked about them and just stated what I had. And I WILL commment on how much better the older than A series were with regards to the MANUAL FOCUS feel because its relevant to those who PREFER MANUAL FOCUS lenses for many applications. AF lenses are not better than MF ,they are different from MF. And with regards to MF "feel" , the MF lenses are generally way better than ALL AF lenses for MF usage by design. So this post of yours is the true NONSENSE. I wasnt even considering AF lenses in any of my posts on the topic. jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 1:49 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: FS: Pentax SMC-A 35mm f/2 Guys, The more you engage him in discussion, the more ridiculous it will become. The FA35/2 AL is a different, and better, optical formula than the older 35/2. That's not to say that the M/A35/2 is a poor performer or that the A35/2 that's for sale is not a good lens. I don't give a damn what the M42, M or K series lenses feel like. They're irrelevant to my needs, and I prefer the better PERFORMING lenses anyway. I take pictures, I don't wax ecstatic over how many lenses I've got or how wonderful the old shit was. sick of this nonsense Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
