Very nice. Definitely sharper than the Chicago pic.
Paul
On Jan 12, 2007, at 7:41 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:

> On 13/01/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What's interesting about this Chicago skyline panorama is the
>> software with which it's presented. You can zoom in on a tiny portion
>> of the image just by clicking. It's good. It could probably have been
>> better if shot with a nicer lens. As an old Chicagoan, I know exactly
>> where it was shot: from the man-made peninsula where the planetarium
>> is located. I shot the skyline from the same spot thirty-five  
>> years ago.
>
> I agree, however the Montreal pano that I mentioned is pretty much
> technically perfect as well as being a very nice shot (big version):
>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/47/ 
> Montreal_Twilight_Panorama_2006.jpg
>
> -- 
> Rob Studdert
> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to