Must have missed that or just forgot. Oh well.
I;ll wait.:-) Dave Quoting Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Godders offered it here. I considered it, but I'll probably go for > the DA 70. May sell my K 85/1.8 first. Then again, I might not:-). > Paul > On Jan 13, 2007, at 6:31 PM, David J Brooks wrote: > >> Argg. >> >> I would have taken that off your hands. >> >> Not sure when the one i ordered will even arive. >> >> Dave >> >> Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> ... I finally decided that the DA70/2.4 Limited was a better pick for >>> me than the FA77/1.8 Limited. The shorter focal length and QuickShift >>> focus are what have drawn me this way, coupled with an extensive >>> array of photos that compared them in which I decided that, aside >>> from focal length considerations, the rendering quality is as near >>> identical as it can get. The difference in maximum aperture is not an >>> issue for me, and I'm liking the notion of its reduced size and >>> weight as well. >>> >>> One of the folks from the DPReview.com forum bought the FA77 for just >>> about what I paid for it, and the DA70 is on its way here now. Will >>> report further when I put it to use. :-) >>> >>> Godfrey >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >> >> >> >> Equine Photography in York Region >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
