I don't consider a photo.net subsciption "selling out." It's a very nice format and well worth the $25 a year for virtually unlimited upload space. Actually, PhotoBucket is much slower, at least from my service. But I'm pleased to learn that I can buy rights to your photos from PhotoBucket:-). Paul Paul On Jan 13, 2007, at 7:20 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 14/01/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Why not use a site where you're at least minimally protected? >> Photo.net makes it clear that the photographer is the owner of the >> copyright. And it's faster. > > Because Photo.net so slow it's ridiculous here and it's very limited > if you don't wish to sell out for an annual subscription. PhotoBucket > is designed for direct linking, they promote it. So I use it for > posting images in web fora, and lastly I have a desktop drag and drop > interface that allows me to use any of my DAM tools to select and > initiate an up-load. So it's cost effective, convenient and fast to > access and update. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
