You're right. the DA 50-200 a good lens. However, it doesn't have quite 
as good a feel as the DA 16-45, and it's quite a bit short of the 
excellent build quality of the DA 12-24.
Paul
On Jan 14, 2007, at 6:08 AM, Thibouille wrote:

> I do not see any build quality on my particuliar DA 50-200.
> It feels certainly beter built than ma DA 18-55.
>
> 2007/1/14, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Pentax now offers the DA 40-200 4/5.6. An  excellent lens for the
>> money, although the build quality is so-so. The next lens you'll see
>> that meets your needs is the DA*. I believe it's a 60-210, f4. If you
>> require full frame, there are no lenses on the chart.
>> Paul
>> On Jan 14, 2007, at 12:19 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>>
>>> Have you tried a basic L bracket grip with the combo? I have used
>>> these
>>> for
>>> years with long/heavy lenses and they certainly help.
>>> jco
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>> Behalf Of
>>> Mark Erickson
>>> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 11:43 PM
>>> To: PDML
>>> Subject: quick report: A 70-210 F4 on *ist-Ds
>>>
>>>
>>> I sold my FA* 80-200 F2.8 for way too much money last spring and 
>>> ended
>>> up with a hole in my lens lineup.  To fill it, I picked up an SMC-A
>>> 70-210 F4 zoom on eBay recently.  Here's my quick report on using it
>>> with my *ist-Ds and pixel-peeping the results.  I got this lens
>>> based on
>>> advice from Bruce Dayton and others on the list....
>>>
>>> Image quality: Quite sharp wide open at both ends (70 and 210).  Not 
>>> a
>>> lot sharper stopped down to F11, but a bit higher contrast when
>>> stopped
>>> down. The built in hood and/or SMC coating seems to do a good job.
>>>
>>> Handling: Longer than I expected.  Feels good on an MZ-S with battery
>>> grip, but completely overpowers the *ist-Ds.  The small grip of the 
>>> Ds
>>> doesn't have enough leverage to handle the lens, so my right hand 
>>> gets
>>> tired pretty fast even when I'm using my left to support the lens.
>>> I'll
>>> have to try different methods of holding the lens and camera to find 
>>> a
>>> comfortable solution.  My guess is that the lens would feel pretty
>>> good
>>> on a K10D with battery grip.  About as big and heavy as I would
>>> want to
>>> put on my Ds on a tripod.  It would probably be better on a bean-bag
>>> support.
>>>
>>> Conclusion:  this lens fills a gap between the 200mm F5.6 low-cost
>>> zooms
>>> and "professional grade" F2.8 lenses.  I really really really wish
>>> that
>>> Pentax would release an autofocus version of this lens!  I picked 
>>> mine
>>> up on eBay in near-new condition with hard case for around $120.
>>>
>>> --Mark
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
> ----------------------
> *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to