David J Brooks wrote: > http://www.equiman.com/cgi-bin/ubb/Forum8/HTML/022168.html > > This is from an Equine BB i moderate. > > Sometime they ask about were to get processing done. > > I ~could~ be wrong, but check out the replies from Hi-Jinks > > I think there could be flaws here, no.If not, give me some ammo here.:-)
Back when I shot film I had mis-exposed rolls several times - probably less than 0.1% but still several times. Problems included just poor development (negs dense beyond use or too thin), inconsistent development (middle of the roll too thin), chemistry burns (clear spots on transparency film in a liquid splash pattern) and lastly film shredded into confetti by one drug store machine. (In that case there was no arguing that the camera somehow did it!) I think the machines are more or less fool proof until they break, and then the film in them often gets affected. It's simple to tell if the film is OK by looking at the numbers along the edge and seeing if they look right. - MCC -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mark Cassino Photography Kalamazoo, Michigan www.markcassino.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
