It is a great tool.  Under certain circumstances you can get some  
extreme results.  This (the fifth picture I made with K10D):
http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m265/dagthrane/_IGP0005.jpg

was made hand held at 1s exposure time with FA50mm @ 1:1.4.  It´s not  
completely sharp, but it was a bit dark for the AF as well...

This is a more realistic example, with DA70 at 1/15s and 1:2.4 and is  
very sharp:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=284758

DagT

Den 15. jan. 2007 kl. 07.41 skrev Sandy Harris:

> Pentax claim their shake reduction is worth "2.5 to 4 stops". Some
> Canon ads describe some of their lenses as having "3-stop" or
> "4-stop"  IS.
>
> Are these claims anywhere near believable? What are actual users
> of K100D or K10D finding?
>
> If those claims are real, then an F 2.8 lens with three-stops of extra
> tolerance for low light will (in some ways) match an F 1.0 lens. Wow!
> Even if it is only one stop, or 1.5, that's still a very useful gain.
>
> If Pentax's "2.5 to 4 stops" claim is accurate, then like a Sigma
> 18-50/2.8 zoom (equivalent to 28-75 on 35mm) then becomes
> awfully attractive. That one lens could handle nearly all of the
> shots I take.
>
> If the claim is accurate, then even a fairly slow lens like the
> Pentax 20-35 F4 becomes quite usable in low light.
>
> What if you use a fast lens? An F 1.2 prime plus the claimed 2.5-4
> stops gives F 0.5 or better. Even a 1.8 becomes remarkably good
> in low light.
>
> Or is this all just too good to be true?
>
> Yes, I do realise that a shake reduction system will neither allow  
> fast
> shutter speeds for stopping motion nor give the reduced depth of field
> that a fast lens will. Also, that no magic is going to make a poor  
> lens
> perform like a top-of-the-line one, or a zoom like a good prime, in
> sharpness, color rendition, etc.
>
> But, given a decent lens, what sort of low light performance should
> one expect?
>
> -- 
> Sandy Harris
> Quanzhou, Fujian, China
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

DagT




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to