Wendy simply a wonderful image!
Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "wendy beard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Hybrid RAW processing > Well, I missed the thread about linear RAW conversion. > I actually stumbled on the linear RAW option about a week o two ago. I > was trying to convert an image and it was proving tricky. I had > overexposed some shots. I was aiming for slight overexposure but had > gone a little too far. As I liked these particular poses I was trying > different methods to convert the RAW files. Through trial & error, I > found that a linear conversion gave me the best results and also got > rid of a slight colour cast present in the other conversions. Not > quite the same as the hybrid method in the article but quite > effective. > Here's the result > http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/72758272 > > Wendy > > On 1/19/07, Cory Papenfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > One more, and then I'll give it a rest for the rest of the day. >> > >> > Are any of you doing anything like this: >> > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/hybrid-conversion.shtml >> > >> > Is it worth the effort? And what's your opinion of the finished >> > product? (There's an example photo in the tutorial.) >> > >> Apparently not if you want to be a "photographer." As per a >> thread a week or so ago, nobody would ever want to do a linear RAW >> conversion. If you do that, you're a technician wanting only to get the >> maximum signal to noise ratio out of a "measurement instrument".... not >> trying to produce photographs. >> >> </snide commentary mode> >> >> (Actually, it looks pretty cool to me) >> >> -Cory > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
